Selasa, 10 November 2009

The Best Team Of The Decade: The 2001-02 Detroit Red Wings



Many things are easy to debate because there isn't necessarily a measuring stick for everything when it comes to a player or a team. You can argue how one player's ability to score goals isn't as valuable as someone else's ability to generate plays, or how a team's attention to defense isn't as valuable as a team's ability to just win. Yet when it comes to the best team assembled in the past decade, maybe even the past 20 years, there's not a contest as to who that team is.

It's the 2001-02 Detroit Red Wings.

As it stands, three players from the 2001-02 Red Wings Team, being Steve Yzerman, Brett Hull, and Luc Robataille, were inducted into the Hall of Fame this year. They join Igor Larionov and Scotty Bowman as both alumni from the 2001-02 Red Wings team and inductees into the Hockey Hall of Fame. Considering how many other qualified players are eligible to be inducted, that's quite an honor for them to make the cut.

But what about the other players who have yet to retire (or be retired long enough) to warrant their own inclusion into the HHOF? Red Wings fans don't need to mention the contributions that Nicklas Lidstrom made toward the team and provided the club with a franchise player who took the torch when it was time for Yzerman to retire. The team could have belonged to Sergei Fedorov, whose 1179 NHL points place him among the game's best, had he placed the team before himself. No one can blame Brendan Shanahan for leaving when he did; he gave the Red Wings the best years of his career before they transformed from a rough-and-tumble North American-based team into a finesse-based European-styled team, leaving Shanahan on the outside looking in as the team's only player who embraced the concept of toughness. While Chris Chelios didn't necessarily give Detroit his best years per se, he did extend a career that many thought would be over in 3 seasons to 10 and is still showing no signs of stopping after signing a contract with the Chicago Wolves of the AHL. Dominik Hasek, who remains the premier European goaltender of all time, backstopped this team through some grueling series that saw him facing none other than long-time nemesis Patrick Roy, whom many point to as being better than Hasek largely because of his birthplace. He's still young in his career, but the 2001-02 season was the rookie season of a sixth-round draft pick named Pavel Datsyuk, who has gone on to become one of the most dynamic two-way players in the game today. While Steve Duchesne may still be waiting for his turn to be inducted, his career as a defenseman that could both score and provide an abundance of grit leaves him as one of the best defenders to ever play the game. You look at any of the names in the above paragraph and you know that it's not a matter of if they'll be in the HHOF, but rather when that will happen.

While legends make for a great team, this group also had an unsung supporting cast that was just as important as their star power. The infamous Grind Line of Kris Draper, Kirk Maltby, and Darren McCarty gave the Red Wings a line that featured the most complete checking unit in the league that season while forward Tomas Holmstrom remains one of the best power play screeners/deflectors the game's ever had. Jiri Fischer was only beginning to touch on the potential of his career before his heart condition forced him into retirement while Mathieu Dandenault gave the team a roving player who's career may still be legitimate had he not left for more money in Montreal. Manny Legace has forever been considered one of the best backups in the league and parlayed that role into several starting opportunities for Detroit, The St. Louis Blues, and now the Carolina Hurricanes. Boyd Deveraux supplied the team with a legitimate checking presence before concussion issues forced him to pursue a career in the minors. While there were a few fringe players and prospects who flamed out during their time with the club that season, the 2001-02 season was the beginning of the NHL careers for current Red Wings forward Jason Williams and some guy named Sean Avery. Maybe you've heard of him.

The early-80's New York Islanders and the late-80's Edmonton Oilers supplied dynasties that provided a lifetime worth of memories. Yet after economics dismantled both teams, there never was a team that was as loaded with star power these guys had (with absolutely no disrespect to the 1994 New York Rangers or the 2001 Colorado Avalanche.) Not only were they likely the best team of the decade, but they were the last team of this magnitude to be assembled before the lockout. Yes, the team was an embarrassment of riches, but when your money is made through winning, than you have to invest wisely if you want business to be good. I'm glad Mike Illitch understood that concept.

2001-02 Detroit Red Wings, we at The Bruise Brothers say you're the best and we salute you!

Senin, 02 November 2009

So What's Up With The "Charity" Point?

It's been a-while, but with the frequency I've been working lately, I've not had much the time to update the blog with anything noteworthy that you couldn't get from various news sources. With that said, now's a more op-ed piece that people like to either disagree with or agree with.

I was on TSN earlier today when I saw the article written about how the NHL should switch to a Win-Loss system instead of having the 2-1-0 point system that's reminiscent of when games resulted in ties. The argument made, ones that I've heard plenty of times before, are that the games aren't as competitive with the current point system and undeserving teams may end up in the playoffs simply because they could make it to the "fourth" period.

So what do I think? I think it should be handled one of two ways:

Go back to tie games and remain with the 2-1-0 system: As a person who things the shootout is sort of silly, this is an easier way for us to handle the situation. Let the guys grind it out for potentially 65 minutes and if there's still no winner there, then the game's tied.

However, the majority of fans like the shootout and hey, I shouldn't hold it against them for that because it does decide a winner. So what would I like to see considering that I have to accept the shootout as a fact of hockey life?

Adopt the 3-2-1-0 system: That's 3 points for a regulation win, 2 points for an overtime or shootout win, 1 point for an overtime or shootout loss, and no points for a regulation loss.

The reason I'm huge on this system is that it's completely fair while promoting a sense of competition to get true results. For people who want to see better competition, the teams will have more incentive to battle for that extra point in regulation instead of skating loftily to overtime. For people who want to see the best team achieve the best standings, this standard would provide a better chance to feature teams that were able to finish games before the overtime period than to have teams at the top because by the end of the game, they were able to win at a skills competition against the opposing goaltender. It also gives credit to those who were able to go into overtime, even if they lost, as opposed to the teams who can't quite exude enough effort to require the extra time.

People can argue about how basketball and baseball don't have ties. Well, the last I checked baseball was nowhere near as intense of a physical sport as hockey. Also, basketball's scoring system is a whole lot more prolific than hockey's and will never require a free-throw contest to end the game. The players who play the game battle hard each minute their on the ice. I think that if the team was able to make it to overtime, it should shine on the stats for both the teams and (especially) the goaltenders.

The current system is flawed because it doesn't give the proper value to victories. The idea of going win-loss is flawed because it doesn't give proper value to losses. Traditionalists would like to see the games go back to ties but the modern-day hockey fan wants to see the shootout. That said, the 3-2-1-0 point system is, in my humble opinion, the best way to go in order to give the best teams the best chance at being in the playoffs.

What do you think?